Monday, April 18, 2011

Novelty addicts anonymous: getting into recovery

My name is Mike, and I'm a novelty addict.

For years my problem has been diagnosed as mild ADD. Perhaps it is. But it's more helpful to me, right now, to look at it as a kind of addiction. I'll explain why, but first let me describe what I mean by addict and addiction.


When I say I'm an addict, I mean this: when I do something that I know is wrong, something that when I think about it carefully has more bad effects than good ones, and I do it anyway, then I'm being an addict. I know I should finish things that I start, and not go off pursuing something new. But I do it anyway. I'm a high functioning novelty addict, but I'm still an addict. And I'm in my second day of recovery.

The problem we novelty addicts have is this: unless we're under constant supervision, or under active threat, we don't get stuff done. Whatever I am doing, I'll soon find something more interesting to do. That's inevitable because anything, anything at all, becomes less novel after a short while. So it's not long before I'm feeding my habit. I'll jump from one necessary or formerly interesting thing to some newer, more shiny thing. That's my addictive behavior.

I've kept my addiction enough under control that I've been able to get good grades in school, and have a successful career. I've done my work, albeit with many interruptions and only focusing when the pressure is on. Why? Well, there's nothing quite so interesting as a threat to survival! It's practically the most interesting thing there can be--until the threat is past. And I've been able to raise a family and carry out household responsibilities--albeit with a certain amount of nagging and occasional threats to my survival. Others have been victims of my addiction, but I've kept it under control. The main damage has been self-damage. The principal victim of my addiction has been me (although my wife might argue otherwise.)

So even though I've managed my addiction well enough to have a successful career and to keep my wife from killing me, my personal life has been a series of largely unfinished personal projects. I am not talking about chores. My long-suffering wife sees that they get done. No, these are projects that I want to do. In some cases they are projects that I really want to do. In many cases they are  projects that I really, really, really want to do. I start them, but I don't finish them.

Take writing, for example. I love to write. I've always loved to write. I've got a a near-endless list of personal writing projects--some of which even I've started on. But in general, as much as I love writing, as much as I think that writing would be good for me, I don't write. I have no fewer than seven blogs all set up and configured, ready to receive what I write--and very little written. Apparently setting up a blog has more novelty content than actually writing. The addiction takes over and nothing gets done.

I look back on my life with a mixture of pleasure, despite my addiction, and frustration. The pleasure comes  both from my non-addictive accomplishments, and from the fact that many of my addictive behaviors are useful and beneficial. Learning new things is a novelty, so despite jumping from topic to topic, I've learned a lot. Practicing guitar was novel for a while; so was playing keyboards. I do both from time to time, but after a while the interest fades, and my addiction must be fed. I stick with nothing unless required to by "higher powers"--my wife, my boss, or some other power.

I'm also addicted to reading email. For me, email addiction is a specific form of novelty addiction. It might also be looked at as a separate addiction, in its own right. I know that checking email not only takes time, but it reduces concentration and focus. But I do it anyway. At my worst I'll check it dozens of times a day. At my very worst, dozens of times an hour. When an email comes in, I'm on it. It's something new! It's attention. If it's from someone I need to reply to, even better. I'll write a well-crafted reply and send it off. I get a brief burst of satisfaction when I send a good reply. It's better than whatever the hell I was doing when the email came it. It keeps me looking for more emails. It keeps me hooked. I'm an email addict.

I have other addictions as well. There's Internet browsing addiction, for example. But they're all varieties of the one major addiction: novelty. Once I looked at it as an addiction I had taken the first step on the road to recovery. The question then became: what next?

The answer (I hypothesize, being only in my second day of recovery) is to follow my own adapted version of the 12-step process used in almost all addiction recovery programs. You start with the first step: knowing you have a problem. You get specific about it. In the adapted words of the original Alcoholics Anonymous program step 1 is:
We admitted that we were powerless over novelty addiction--that at least a part of our lives had become unmanageable. 
That's me, powerless with parts of my life unmanageable. I am a novelty addict; an email junkie; a browsing fiend; a starting-projects-and-not-finishing-them hound (Starting gives me a rush; working them is hard, boring, or both; finishing? Don't even ask about it.). I am a novelty addict. Yesterday, I realized that I was an addict. Today I am in my second day of recovery. This posting is a hopeful sign. We'll see what happens when the novelty wears off.


Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Everything happens for a reason

When something bad happens, the mind cries out for answers: why did this happen? What does it mean? Unfortunately the mind also provides answers. Sadly, the answers that it provides are generally wrong and not very useful.

I have learned that there are many questions that I cannot answer, but these two I can: everything happens for a reason (many reasons, actually); we can choose (some of) our reasons, and our lives depends on which ones we choose. Everything may mean something different to every different person (and sometimes can mean many things to the same person); we decide at least some of those meanings and our lives depend on what we decide.

Except in matters of science, where reasons can be verified with some certainty, the best reasons and the best meanings are not the "truest" ones but the most useful ones. Indeed "truest" has no real meaning when you can not subject a statement to a test, but "useful" does.

So if something bad happens to you, then among the best reasons I can offer to you (and I encourage you to accept) is: "This happened so that you can learn from it." It's as true as you can make it, and it's as useful as any reason can be. If you want to know what it means when something bad happens I suggest the meta-meaning: "It means what you make it mean. And if you learn something worth valuing from it that will then be its meaning."

I do not believe that things happen because of the workings of Karma or fate. Perhaps it's true, but it's fairly useless to me. I do believe that things happen to us because of chains of causality rooted in the laws of physics: place yourself in front of a speeding car a few microseconds before it reaches you, and I guarantee you will get hit, no Karma about it, and placing yourself there is a good reason to explain what happened. But that's also a fairly useless explanation.

What if someone says something hurtful to you? Or what if you get an illness or suffer from some physical condition? Physics does not even provide a good explanation except at a uselessly abstract level ("Your cancer, Mr. Johnson, is due to a cell's improper division making it malignant."). My answer for myself, and the one that I recommend to you is: "Whatever happened happened (among other reasons) so that you can learn something from it." That's the one to keep in mind. And it will be both true and useful if you will it so.

Recently I've had a few setbacks (nothing terminal that I know of--and good things as well) and unpleasant things have happened to friends of mine (and good things). Why did these things happen and what do they mean? As always there are many reasons, but one reason for me is so that I could think this through and write this down.

These have been useful beliefs for a good part of my life. It has helped me to remind myself of them and to remind myself that I always have a choice about what I believe.

I hope it encourages you to consider it (and try it) if you have not previously heard it; or it convinces you if it makes enough sense; or reminds you if you know it already.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Your duty to be happy. Enjoy it!

I picked this up in a book of quotations and wrote down some of the ones that I liked, drafted this and let it sit in my drafts folder waiting for the right time. And now, at the urging of Z3, it's the right time.

Helen Keller who was the world's most famous blind, deaf, and dumb kid until Tommy the pinball wizard came along, had every reason to not be happy. Let's face it: life screwed her. But she says:
If I regarded my life from the point of view of the pessimist, I should be undone. I should seek in vain for the light that does not visit my eyes and the music that does not ring in my ears. I should beg night and day and never be satisfied. I should sit apart in awful solitude, a prey to fear and despair. But since I consider it a duty to myself and to others to be happy, I escape a misery worse than any physical deprivation.
I'll repeat the salient point:
I consider it a duty to myself and to others to be happy,
Being happy is easy for some people, and if it is a duty, they carry it out without difficulty. Most of them don't know, or don't think about the fact that sooner or later the sun will go cold and freeze the earth, or go nova and burn all to cinders, and no matter what the universe will suffer heat death and that means (as far as we know) that no matter what we do, everything is ultimately going to turn to shit. Some people are happy because they are born with a nervous system that allows them to be aware of these and other unpleasant realities and dismiss them.

But some of us have to work hard to be happy, and knowing that it's a duty, a solemn responsibility might help.

I came to this conclusion late in life, in fact after I had already taken responsibility and decided that I needed to do something about my life. If there is a turning point in my "quest for the good life" it's when I realized what I had to do in order to enjoy it.

Enjoying
Most people think that enjoying an experience means taking joy from the experience. I realized that enjoying could mean something different: putting joy into it. If you can learn to en-joy things, but put joy into things, then you can take joy from whatever goes on.

Consider word origins. The prefix en- is used in the following ways:

definition: for example:
put into or onengulf, enmesh
bring into the condition ofenlighten, embitter
intensificationentangle, enrage

So en-joy can mean: to put into joy; to bring into the condition of joy. to intensify joy. In other words, enjoy doesn't mean you take away joy (though you could). It's something you can bring, put in, intensify. Enjoying is an act of creation--not an act of consumption.

It's possible to be the beneficiary of a lot of joy you did not create, and that's not a bad thing. At the U2 concert I went to last year, 85,000 people showed up with their joy. And so did I. We filled that stadium with our joy. And we all magically walked away with more joy than we started with. Gogol Bordello routinely does that for me as well.

Now you might be able to actually enjoy something when you had no hand in bringing the joy, or putting the joy in, or intensifying the joy, but it's a riskier bet than if you come with your own joy. And if instead of bringing joy you bring suspicion, hurt, wariness, blame, worry, or just plain old conservatism, there's good odds that you're not going to enjoy what happens. How can you?

I learned this lesson a couple of years ago, and got myself to enjoying everything that happened. Even things that kind of sucked can be enjoyed. You're really into enjoyment when you can say: "I never threw up on a boat before! That was interesting!" Or "I've never had burnt waffles before, so how do I know I won't enjoy them." That's my hero.

Enjoying things makes life better--more enjoyable, you might say. It makes it better for you--and as a side benefit for everyone around you. It's not just a pleasure, though. I believe in what Helen Keller says. It's a duty. If everyone made it their job to bring joy to every occasion what a great world we would have.

I believe that "enjoy-ment" is a skill. You get enjoyment when you put the effort in. When you don't, you might bet lucky, or out might get unlucky. You've let it go out of your hands.

Enjoyment is a teachable skill. And if someone cares to work at it, it's a learnable skill. Some people are born with a natural ability to enjoy--they can get better, And most important, they can inspire others--as I am inspired right now.

Others find it harder. They have to work hard to be any good at all. I was a pretty miserable kid, but I learned over years to enjoy many things--and ultimately (before I forgot how important it was) I learned how to deliberately and diligently enjoy every thing. Right now I'm enjoying writing this. And I'm also enjoying sleeplessness, which normally I hate.

You can decide to bring joy to anything. And if you do, then you can enjoy anything at all. That's the decision I've rediscovered and re made. I recommend it to you.

I hope you will decide to enjoy everything that is. Sometimes it's tricky, and sometimes it's hard. But I believe it's worthwhile. But you can also decide differently. Your can decide to take joy from an occasion only if it meets some standard. Or is someone else brings enough joy, you might take some away. These are all fine choices, but I think that learning how to bring joy, to invest joy leads to a better life. I hope you take responsibility for being happy as a duty, and that you en-joy that.

I hope you enjoy!

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Perfection

From "Confessions of a Public Speaker" by Scott Berkun:

I know I make small mistakes all the time. There's no way not to. Besides, when performing, perfection is bording. Tyler Durden, the qausi-hero from the film, said to stop being perfect because obsessing about perfection stops you from growing. You stop taking chances, which means you stop learning. I don't want to be perfect. I want to be useful, I want to be good, and I want to sound like myself. Trying to be perfect gets in the way of all three.
Cool! So all I have to do is stop worrying about making mistakes, and I'll be perfect! I can do that.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Making more mistakes

It was 10:22 AM, Eastern Time, when I made my decision. I was sitting in at the counter in the main room in my home in Blue Hill, Maine. I decided to start making more errors and mistakes. Maybe that was a mistake. But I made it.

Then I decided to write a post memorializing my decision. Maybe that was a mistake, too. Maybe it's a mistake to start the Post with the time and locale of my mistake. Two paragraphs in, and so many mistakes already!

How I made my mistakes
I'd been reading a book called "Fearless creating" by Eric Maisel (Amazon.com: Fearless Creating: ... ). Another mistake. That first statement contains an error. I'd actually been not-reading the book for several months. It sat on my bedside table next to things that I was reading.

I picked it up yesterday perhaps because it was the only thing on my bedside table as I headed off to the toilet (perhaps it was a mistake to say that) and I read this, one of the exercises in Maisel's book:

Practice the following exercise on the linoleum floor of your kitchen or on some similar surface. Thoroughly clean a three-by-three-foot square of the floor. [He explains how.]

Now mix up a little mud.

" With a heavy heart, but a strong will, muddy the floor." [He explains how, and asks: "Should it lower your self-esteem?"]

Now the point.

"You muddied the floor. But you did it as an exercise, to help you learn something. That is exactly the way to hold mistakes. You are making mistakes but...you are making them in the service of something vital, the creation of something true and beautiful...

"Mistakes made when you create are not mistakes. Do not fear them.

Today I read it again. And started making mistakes, beginning with this post.

Mistakes in this post

This post may have spelling errors. Most of my posts do, despite perfunctory spell-checking. It may have grammar errors. It has many sentences that have not been written as well as I could have written them. At least that's what I think. Are those mistakes? Or is it a mistake to try and perfect those sentences? Or a mistake to even think about which is the mistake and which is not? And maybe that's the point.

All creation involves mistakes and potential mistakes. And right now I'm about to make some more mistakes. I don't have a good way to end this post. Is it a mistake to sit and think of something really good, something that ties everything together. Or is it a mistake to just hit "Publich Post", and get on to the next set of mistakes.

I think I'll hit Post, right now. That's the mistake I've decided to make. And by the time you see this, I'll have made it.

(Well, actually I didn't do that. I did an editing pass on the post. And then another when I transfered it from Wave to Blogger. Were those mistakes? I guess so).

Time to hit Publish Post.

It was 10:22 AM, Eastern Time, when I made my decision. I was sitting in at the counter in the main room in my home in Blue Hill, Maine. I decided to start making more errors and mistakes. Maybe that was a mistake. But I made it. Then I decided to write a post memorializing my decision. Maybe that was a mistake. Maybe it's a mistake to start the Post with the time and locale of my mistake. Two paragraphs in, and so many mistakes already.How I made my mistakesI'd been reading a book called "Fearless creating" by Eric Maisel (Amazon.com: Fearless Creating: ... ). That statement contains an error. I'd actually been not-reading the book for several months. It sat on my bedside table next to things that I was reading. I picked it up yesterday perhaps because it was the only thing on my bedside table as I headed off to the toilet (perhaps it was a mistake to say that) and I read this, one of the exercises in Maisel's book:"Practice the following exercise on the linoleum floor of your kitchen or on some similar surface. Thoroughly clean a three-by-three-foot square of the floor. [He explains how.]Now mix up a little mud." With a heavy heart, but a strong will, muddy the floor." [He explains how, and asks: "Should it lower your self-esteem?"]Now the point."You muddied the floor. But you did it as an exercise, to help you learn something. That is exactly the way to hold mistakes. You are making mistakes but...you are making them in the service of something vital, the creation of something true and beautiful..."Mistakes made when you create are not mistakes. Do not fear them.Today I read it again. And started making mistakes, beginning with this post.Mistakes in this postThis post may have spelling errors. Most of my posts do, despite perfunctory spell-checking. It may have grammar errors. It has many sentences that have not been written as well as I could have written them. At least that's what I think. Are those mistakes? Or is it a mistake to try and perfect those sentences? Or a mistake to even think about which is the mistake and which is not? And maybe that's the point.All creation involves mistakes and potential mistakes. And right now I'm about to make another mistake. I don't have a good way to end this post. Is it a mistake to sit and think of something really good, something that ties everything together. Or is it a mistake to just hit "Post", and get on to the next set of mistakes. I think I'll hit Post, right now. That's the mistake I've decided to make. And by the time you see this, I'll have made it.(Well, actually I didn't do that. I did an editing pass on the post. Was that a mistake? I guess so)." __wave_annotations="25,2736,style%2FfontFamily,Georgia%2C+serif:474,496,style%2FfontWeight,bold:565,600,link%2Fmanual,http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FFearless-Creating-Step-Step-Completing%2Fdp%2F0874778050:565,576,link%2Fauto,http%3A%2F%2FAmazon.com%3A:656,667,style%2FfontStyle,italic:1409,1450,style%2FfontStyle,italic:1738,1759,style%2FfontWeight,bold:" class="__wave_paste">

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Life's lessons: over and over, until you get them

That's the way life works. You run into a situation. You figure out how to deal with it. Then you forget. Then she same shit happens again. So you figure out how to deal with it. Oh, wait! That was the same thing you did last time. Then you forget. And once again, the same goddamn thing happens. And again, you have to figure it out. And again, it's the same thing. Eventually, say by the time you're sixty seven, you figure out that there's a pattern. And you write about it (in a suitably abstract way) in one of your blogs, the better to remember it. And tomorrow, who knows, maybe you won't forget.

OK, let's get specific.
First, substitute "I" for "you" in the first paragraph. Second, substitute feeling "lacking in energy," "down," or "depressed" for "situation" and its various other incarnations. Substitute "listen to music" for "you figure out how to do it."

Two nights ago, I dragged my tired ass down to the library at 11:30 PM to suck down some of their excellent bandwidth so that I could listen to my current favorite band, U2, streaming on my favorite video site, YouTube. At 2:30 when the concert was over, I was jazzed. No sleep without chemical help. And not tired the next two nights. Then tonight, tired. And struggling I found an old answer (not music, but a subject for another post). But then I remembered the music, and now I'm listening to my favorite Polish Sea Chantey streaming web site (Szanty24.pl, courtesy of Z3) and I may never go to sleep again. At least unti l finish this post.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

GSD Medical Plan gaining support

The Wolf Report has learned that a new medical plan, called "The GSD Plan" is gaining bipartisan support within both the House and Senate. Observers believe that it may represent the kind of new thinking that can bring the nation together on this divisive issue.

"This is the one plan that meets both the goals of the President, of liberals who want universal health care, and of fiscal conservatives who don't want an exploding national debt," said Jim Beam, who heads the Committee for the GSD Plan. "The GSD Plan can provide health care to every American, without exception, and can do so at lower costs than any other plan being considered. Furthermore it's a tried and true plan, one that millions of people--rich and poor alike--have used successfully. All we've done is to formalize the plan, give it a name, and spend $250 million dollars lobbying for its adoption.

GSD, which stands for "Get Sick and Die," was the medical plan chosen by George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and almost all of the other Founding Fathers. Today it's the plan that covers millions of Americans, most of whom believe that they don't have a health care plan. "In fact," says Beam, "they are covered by the plan that the richest and most powerful people in this country used until recently. People need to realize that they have this great coverage, and then maybe stop whining and shut up."

Some critics believe that GSD will not provide good health care, But Beam disagrees. "GSD provides excellent care. George Washington died at age 67, Thomas Jefferson at 83 and John Adams at 90, to name just a few people who used GSD. I'd say that's a pretty good record."

According to Beam, the GSD that the Founding Fathers enjoyed has been improved to take advantage of the latest medical research. Bleeding and blistering will no longer be covered. Healing with crystals will be reimbursed, but with a $10.00 co-pay.